CNN recently redesigned their site, and I have to say it makes me a little sad. Usually these big corporations have the money to put in to serious design, and news agencies especially are looked to as sources of innovation, since their bread and butter is typography and layout. CNN’s new design, on the other hand, looks like a customized (maybe even ’slightly customized’) WordPress theme.
Three-column home page, two-column sub-pages. I know that blogs have become albeit sometimes questionable sources of information that have seeped into the world of journalism, but that the blog “design vernacular” has made it’s way to the forefront of one of the internet’s most popular websites is just, well… sad.
One upside: CNN’s taken a cue from the wiki-world and now has keywords linked to “topics” (used much like blog categories) in their articles, which can be handy if you’re interested in more recent stories on a particular topic. I’ll wait for the next round of design and hope for some innovation next time.





LA Public Library retools backend. What were they thinking?
I logged in this morning to check some holds I’d requested on my library account, and I noticed they’d made some improvements. Emphasis on the word “some”. The website for the Los Angeles Public Library isn’t bad, it’s got a nice, welcoming, library-esque feel to it as seen here:
Not horrible. The bit you get to once you sign in always irked me. The functionality was odd, but workable. Why then would they make the back-end look like THIS:
Seriously? Some of the additions include linking to Amazon reviews of books, being able to more easily see what branches have a copy of the book you’re interested in, and more cover images of the collection. They’re in dire need of some formatting, and clicking on a Library Branch under Holding Information gives you a screen with nothing but a map of the library. Hmm…
It looks as if the services provided to the LA Public Library come from The Library Corporation which, according to their website, do provide services that aren’t butt ugly, which begs the questions:
1) Is it ok to provide a steamy pile of design poop to a client who doesn’t have the money to pay for something “better”?
2) Is this re-tooling simply unfinished?
If you have any more info on the redesign please leave it in the comments… I’ll be keeping an eye on this, since I use the service all the time, and I’ll report back if any new developments occur!